Menu

Which Medical Mistakes Cause Brain Injuries at Birth June 11, 2019

Injuries at birth can change a child and the family’s lives forever. Sometimes around the clock care is required for some children who suffered injuries at birth. This is especially true in those cases that involve brain injuries. In many of these cases, the family will be a setback in lifetime expenses running into millions of dollars. There are several circumstances that can lead to a brain injury at birth. A health care lawyer can help you in this kind of situation. Common mistakes that can lead to brain injuries include the following.

Medication Mistakes Involving Pitocin

During the delivery process, there are some medications that can lead to brain injury in the child. For instance, if the medical practitioner gives too much Pitocin (the synthetic form of oxytocin usually used for contractions inducement) or does not monitor the reaction of the mother to the drug. This could cause the mother to experience excessive uterine contractions. This can cut oxygen supply to the baby, leading to brain damage. An experienced health care lawyer can help you in this case.

Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy (HIE)

HIE occurs when there is a disruption in blood and oxygen flow to the child’s brain. The areas affected in the brain and the severity of HIE vary. One way to treat this is with cooling therapy. This helps to cool the body and head of the baby to slow the brain damage progression. The baby may suffer more significant brain damage if the HIE is treated incorrectly or not treated timely. Click here.

The Compression of the Umbilical Cord

There are certain complications with the umbilical cord that can lead to brain injury. The newborn may not receive enough nutrients and oxygen from the mother when the umbilical cord is compressed. If the compression in the umbilical cord is not resolved or treated timely, the child’s brain can suffer cellular damage.

Maternal Infections

There are certain maternal infections such as those caused by Group B Streptococcus (GBS) or Cytomegalovirus (CMV) that may lead to brain damage in an infant. GBS increases the chance of passing the infection to the baby by 2% if left untreated. The risk is even higher in those cases where the mother has a high temperature during labor or the baby is born prematurely. Depending on the onset, the symptoms of the infection can vary. However, maternal infections may lead to sepsis, meningitis, as wells other complications.

Improper Use of Delivery Tools

There are instances where babies are delivered with the help of a vacuum device or forceps. Using these tools incorrectly or in less risky procedures can cause brain damage. For instance, if too much force is used when using these tools, the infant may suffer brain injuries. Vacuum tools or forceps may lead to skull fractures, intracranial hemorrhaging and other poor outcomes when used incorrectly.

There are several other adverse health conditions mothers and their babies may experience during childbirth. The newborn may suffer brain damage if mistakes are made while treating these conditions or failing to provide medical attention time. Hiring an experienced health care lawyer or health care fraud attorney can help you fight for those children or families who have suffered birth injuries at the hands of negligent medical staff. Click here for more information: https://federal-lawyer.com/what-is-a-grand-jury-subpoena-duces-tecum/

Comments Off on Which Medical Mistakes Cause Brain Injuries at Birth

How Will You Pay a Medical Malpractice Lawyer? January 24, 2019

Introduction

For a patient thinking about a restorative negligence claim, a foremost inquiry may be, “How much will enlist a lawyer cost me?” The appropriate healthcare may be very reassuring for some patients who have endured damage through the arrangement of inadequate health care.

Normal Medical Malpractice Fee Arrangements

Most restorative misbehaviour lawyers use possibility expenses. At the point when a lawyer utilizes a possibility charge, the lawyer’s whole expense is paid as a level of the honour or settlement for the situation. In this way, if the case goes to preliminary and the patient loses, the lawyer is never paid an expense. The segment of the honour that goes to the lawyer can shift, however, the most widely recognized unexpected charge is 33% of the honor or settlement. A few courses of action may utilize diverse numbers for various conditions. For instance, a course of action may accommodate a 33% unexpected expense if the case settles before preliminary or a 40% unforeseen charge if the case goes to preliminary.  Another issue is who pays the expenses of the case, which can be significant. These costs incorporate the expense of contracting a specialist witness, court documenting charges, and the expense of acquiring medicinal records from clinics. Numerous lawyers use assertions that give that the lawyer will pay for expenses of prosecution, in any event at first.

Essential Considerations for Patients

The essential thing for each patient to recall is this present: attorney’s expenses are debatable. If you are thinking about enlisting a specific lawyer, you ought to ask yourself, “For what reason am I procuring this lawyer?” “Is this the best, most experienced lawyer?” “Would an alternate lawyer offer a superior cost?”  For what reason doesn’t each patient counsel five unique lawyers and thinks about costs and capabilities? Even though patients, for the most part, don’t do it, there is no motivation behind why patients with potential medicinal negligence cases ought not to search for attorneys. Keep in mind, starting discussions are commonly free. Click here.

Not exclusively is the charge rate debatable, however, different terms are additionally debatable. For instance, a lawyer may propose an assertion that requires a patient to pay for case costs as they emerge. In that circumstance, the patient should seriously mull over taking part in a touch of bartering, telling the lawyer that better terms are likely accessible somewhere else, and that it would be ideal if the lawyer dealing with the expenses of prosecution “in advance,” with the understanding that those expenses would be repaid to the attorney if the offended party gets a judgment or settlement grant in his or her support.

Administrative Efforts to Affect Medical Malpractice Fee Arrangements

Some restorative negligence change savants have contended that vast possibility expenses help drive up the expense of healthcare. Therefore, a few states have passed laws confining possibility expenses in therapeutic negligence cases. A portion of these states incorporates California, Florida, Connecticut, Tennessee, and Wisconsin. The subtleties of the laws that have been passed differ, yet a portion of the laws are exceptionally straightforward. A law may just top attorneys’ charges at close to 1/3 of the measure of the honour or settlement in all restorative negligence cases. Different laws are progressively confounded. For instance, a California law goes in 2002 restricted attorneys’ expenses in medicinal misbehaviour cases to 40% of the first $50,000 recouped, 33% of the following $50,000, 25% of the following $500,000, and 15% of any sum over $600,000.

Conclusion

Despite the administrative structure in some random state, it is imperative for the patient to recall that expenses are debatable. Regardless of whether charges are topped by resolution, a patient is qualified for arrange a lower expense as long as related to healthcare. Check out this site: https://federal-lawyer.com/healthcare-compliance/

Comments Off on How Will You Pay a Medical Malpractice Lawyer?

5 HEALTH CARE LAWS PROTECTING THE RIGHTS OF PATIENTS August 3, 2018

INTRODUCTION

Health care providers face substantial legal challenges under the Affordable Care Act(ACA). Sweeping reforms have created a demand for health care law specialists. As a result, it is the fastest growing law practice in the United States.The current environment requires a renewed focus on the part of health lawyers. Health care lawyers must understand what is happening in the administrative, ethical and legislative components of the health care field to perform proficiently.The following five laws highlight a few of the most recent and significant game-changing regulations in the health care field.

 

EMERGENCY MEDICAL TREATMENT AND ACTIVE LABOUR ACT (EMTALA)

The Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labour Act took effect in 1986 with congressional sanction. The law requires care providers to deliver medical services despite the patients’ ability to pay specifically emergency services. If an individual has a medical emergency, such as an injury or active birth, the law makes it obligatory for caregivers to stabilize the patient and provide treatment up to the point where the client is stable. If the care provider cannot deliver this service, the law mandates that the provider transfer the patient to a capable facility.

 

THE STARK LAW

The Stark Law prohibits care providers from referring a patient to a peer or family member but does provide for specific exceptions.This law applies to civil cases and exposes violators to False Claims Act culpability. The Stark Law encompasses referrals to primary care providers for specific health services and does not require prosecutors to prove intent for overpayments. However, prosecutors must prove intent for intentional violations involving punitive recovery. See more.

 

THE HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FOR ECONOMIC AND CLINICAL HEALTH (HITECH) ACT

This was created to promote effective technology implementation among care providers. It addresses privacy and security of electronic health records. The act also reinforces parts of the civil and criminal sections of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).HITECH outlines four liability levels, each with increased punishments. Offenders who violate the law unknowingly, initially receive the lowest fine and the opportunity to correct the offense in 30 days to avoid fines completely. The minimum penalty increases greatly between each level.The maximum fine amounts to $1.5 million. The health care fraud attorney handles this.

 

THE GENETIC INFORMATION NONDISCRIMINATION ACT OF 2008

Genome sequencing and other scientific developments have enabled researchers to produce incredible medical breakthroughs. While certain gene identifiers do not reveal ethnicity, some genetic traits emerge only among specific ethnic groups. Since discrimination occurred, the federal government created the Genetic Information Non-discrimination Act to prevent employers and insurance agencies from discriminating against individuals based on genetic testing outcomes. It forbids health insurance and employment discrimination based on genomic information.

 

CONCLUSION

Health care innovation moves at such a tremendous pace that even the most legally sound care providers have difficulty keeping up with legal issues. As care providers settle in with new payment models, they will demand more health care legal professionals to keep organizations up-to-date and compliant with the law. Check out this site: https://federal-lawyer.com/after-federally-indicted-options/

Comments Off on 5 HEALTH CARE LAWS PROTECTING THE RIGHTS OF PATIENTS

10 Things Pre-Boomers Need From Health Care Reform November 7, 2016

Health Care

With several bills coming out of both houses of congress, the health care discussion by health care lawyers appears to be far from over even though the administration wants legislation signed this year. The politics of reform are intensifying each passing day. Therefore, without regard to party affiliation, I’ve tried to identify key points for pre-boomers to consider when it comes to health care reform.

The following 10 points are in no particular order.

And, I purposely do not take into consideration what other age or demographic groups may want or need. As a pre-boomer, I believe the items listed below are, or should be, the deal breakers in any health care bill offered to my generation (those born between 1930 and 1945).

1. Ability to keep current doctor(s) and be able to visit them as needed.

2. Assurance of complete and consistent health care until death.

3. Portability of insurance, because seniors do move.

4. Coverage will not be given other groups at the expense of seniors.

5. Allow competition among insurance companies so premium costs can be lower.

6. Insurance companies cannot cancel secondary coverage no matter what.

7. No extra premiums or denials for pre-existing conditions.

8. Any reform must be deficit neutral to keep taxes from going up.

9. Test proposed plan elements rather than initiate immediate, sweeping changes.

10. Eliminate Medicare and Medicaid waste, fraud and abuse, as promised.

Reducing Medicare and Medicaid funding by over $600 billion in order to provide insurance for those currently not covered is not going to fly with most new seniors, certainly not this one. Don’t you wonder how many people are truly uninsured because they can’t afford the premiums or have pre-existing conditions versus those who, for whatever reason, choose not to buy insurance or are here illegally?

The notion that more than a half a trillion dollars in saving can be achieved by reducing waste, health care fraud and abuse is highly questionable. And if it were true, why didn’t the government take steps to realize these savings before the current debate heated up? So someone needs to identify the problems and fix them now.

There have been many implied promises but no guarantees that seniors will not be placed on some kind of rationing or other changes which result in reducing the quality of our health care and health care fraud in the years ahead. So we must be skeptical until the details are revealed.visit site from http://www.wsj.com/articles/worst-performing-stocks-of-2016-health-care-1478433602 for more info.

Health CareIn the meantime, keep the pressure on our representatives in Washington. Ask how they intend to deal with the above 10 points, plus any others you can think of. If we are respectfully persistent with questions, maybe the politicians will get the idea that pre-boomers are serious about our health care coverage. However, should they not be responsive to our needs, and then we don’t need them anymore. And we’ll vote for someone who is willing to listen to the generation of new seniors.

Don Potter, a Philadelphia native, was born in 1936 and is a 50 year veteran of the advertising agency business. Now living in Los Angeles, he has written two novels in retirement, frequently writes on marketing issues, and has a blog dedicated to pre-boomers (those born between 1930 and 1945).

Read more articles for and about pre-boomers with thoughts, comments and opinions designed to spark thinking, foster discussion, and stimulate debate by logging on to this link.

Comments Off on 10 Things Pre-Boomers Need From Health Care Reform