Menu

Which Medical Mistakes Cause Brain Injuries at Birth June 11, 2019

Injuries at birth can change a child and the family’s lives forever. Sometimes around the clock care is required for some children who suffered injuries at birth. This is especially true in those cases that involve brain injuries. In many of these cases, the family will be a setback in lifetime expenses running into millions of dollars. There are several circumstances that can lead to a brain injury at birth. A health care lawyer can help you in this kind of situation. Common mistakes that can lead to brain injuries include the following.

Medication Mistakes Involving Pitocin

During the delivery process, there are some medications that can lead to brain injury in the child. For instance, if the medical practitioner gives too much Pitocin (the synthetic form of oxytocin usually used for contractions inducement) or does not monitor the reaction of the mother to the drug. This could cause the mother to experience excessive uterine contractions. This can cut oxygen supply to the baby, leading to brain damage. An experienced health care lawyer can help you in this case.

Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy (HIE)

HIE occurs when there is a disruption in blood and oxygen flow to the child’s brain. The areas affected in the brain and the severity of HIE vary. One way to treat this is with cooling therapy. This helps to cool the body and head of the baby to slow the brain damage progression. The baby may suffer more significant brain damage if the HIE is treated incorrectly or not treated timely. Click here.

The Compression of the Umbilical Cord

There are certain complications with the umbilical cord that can lead to brain injury. The newborn may not receive enough nutrients and oxygen from the mother when the umbilical cord is compressed. If the compression in the umbilical cord is not resolved or treated timely, the child’s brain can suffer cellular damage.

Maternal Infections

There are certain maternal infections such as those caused by Group B Streptococcus (GBS) or Cytomegalovirus (CMV) that may lead to brain damage in an infant. GBS increases the chance of passing the infection to the baby by 2% if left untreated. The risk is even higher in those cases where the mother has a high temperature during labor or the baby is born prematurely. Depending on the onset, the symptoms of the infection can vary. However, maternal infections may lead to sepsis, meningitis, as wells other complications.

Improper Use of Delivery Tools

There are instances where babies are delivered with the help of a vacuum device or forceps. Using these tools incorrectly or in less risky procedures can cause brain damage. For instance, if too much force is used when using these tools, the infant may suffer brain injuries. Vacuum tools or forceps may lead to skull fractures, intracranial hemorrhaging and other poor outcomes when used incorrectly.

There are several other adverse health conditions mothers and their babies may experience during childbirth. The newborn may suffer brain damage if mistakes are made while treating these conditions or failing to provide medical attention time. Hiring an experienced health care lawyer or health care fraud attorney can help you fight for those children or families who have suffered birth injuries at the hands of negligent medical staff. Click here for more information: https://federal-lawyer.com/what-is-a-grand-jury-subpoena-duces-tecum/

Comments Off on Which Medical Mistakes Cause Brain Injuries at Birth

How Will You Pay a Medical Malpractice Lawyer? January 24, 2019

Introduction

For a patient thinking about a restorative negligence claim, a foremost inquiry may be, “How much will enlist a lawyer cost me?” The appropriate healthcare may be very reassuring for some patients who have endured damage through the arrangement of inadequate health care.

Normal Medical Malpractice Fee Arrangements

Most restorative misbehaviour lawyers use possibility expenses. At the point when a lawyer utilizes a possibility charge, the lawyer’s whole expense is paid as a level of the honour or settlement for the situation. In this way, if the case goes to preliminary and the patient loses, the lawyer is never paid an expense. The segment of the honour that goes to the lawyer can shift, however, the most widely recognized unexpected charge is 33% of the honor or settlement. A few courses of action may utilize diverse numbers for various conditions. For instance, a course of action may accommodate a 33% unexpected expense if the case settles before preliminary or a 40% unforeseen charge if the case goes to preliminary.  Another issue is who pays the expenses of the case, which can be significant. These costs incorporate the expense of contracting a specialist witness, court documenting charges, and the expense of acquiring medicinal records from clinics. Numerous lawyers use assertions that give that the lawyer will pay for expenses of prosecution, in any event at first.

Essential Considerations for Patients

The essential thing for each patient to recall is this present: attorney’s expenses are debatable. If you are thinking about enlisting a specific lawyer, you ought to ask yourself, “For what reason am I procuring this lawyer?” “Is this the best, most experienced lawyer?” “Would an alternate lawyer offer a superior cost?”  For what reason doesn’t each patient counsel five unique lawyers and thinks about costs and capabilities? Even though patients, for the most part, don’t do it, there is no motivation behind why patients with potential medicinal negligence cases ought not to search for attorneys. Keep in mind, starting discussions are commonly free. Click here.

Not exclusively is the charge rate debatable, however, different terms are additionally debatable. For instance, a lawyer may propose an assertion that requires a patient to pay for case costs as they emerge. In that circumstance, the patient should seriously mull over taking part in a touch of bartering, telling the lawyer that better terms are likely accessible somewhere else, and that it would be ideal if the lawyer dealing with the expenses of prosecution “in advance,” with the understanding that those expenses would be repaid to the attorney if the offended party gets a judgment or settlement grant in his or her support.

Administrative Efforts to Affect Medical Malpractice Fee Arrangements

Some restorative negligence change savants have contended that vast possibility expenses help drive up the expense of healthcare. Therefore, a few states have passed laws confining possibility expenses in therapeutic negligence cases. A portion of these states incorporates California, Florida, Connecticut, Tennessee, and Wisconsin. The subtleties of the laws that have been passed differ, yet a portion of the laws are exceptionally straightforward. A law may just top attorneys’ charges at close to 1/3 of the measure of the honour or settlement in all restorative negligence cases. Different laws are progressively confounded. For instance, a California law goes in 2002 restricted attorneys’ expenses in medicinal misbehaviour cases to 40% of the first $50,000 recouped, 33% of the following $50,000, 25% of the following $500,000, and 15% of any sum over $600,000.

Conclusion

Despite the administrative structure in some random state, it is imperative for the patient to recall that expenses are debatable. Regardless of whether charges are topped by resolution, a patient is qualified for arrange a lower expense as long as related to healthcare. Check out this site: https://federal-lawyer.com/healthcare-compliance/

Comments Off on How Will You Pay a Medical Malpractice Lawyer?

5 HEALTH CARE LAWS PROTECTING THE RIGHTS OF PATIENTS August 3, 2018

INTRODUCTION

Health care providers face substantial legal challenges under the Affordable Care Act(ACA). Sweeping reforms have created a demand for health care law specialists. As a result, it is the fastest growing law practice in the United States.The current environment requires a renewed focus on the part of health lawyers. Health care lawyers must understand what is happening in the administrative, ethical and legislative components of the health care field to perform proficiently.The following five laws highlight a few of the most recent and significant game-changing regulations in the health care field.

 

EMERGENCY MEDICAL TREATMENT AND ACTIVE LABOUR ACT (EMTALA)

The Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labour Act took effect in 1986 with congressional sanction. The law requires care providers to deliver medical services despite the patients’ ability to pay specifically emergency services. If an individual has a medical emergency, such as an injury or active birth, the law makes it obligatory for caregivers to stabilize the patient and provide treatment up to the point where the client is stable. If the care provider cannot deliver this service, the law mandates that the provider transfer the patient to a capable facility.

 

THE STARK LAW

The Stark Law prohibits care providers from referring a patient to a peer or family member but does provide for specific exceptions.This law applies to civil cases and exposes violators to False Claims Act culpability. The Stark Law encompasses referrals to primary care providers for specific health services and does not require prosecutors to prove intent for overpayments. However, prosecutors must prove intent for intentional violations involving punitive recovery. See more.

 

THE HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FOR ECONOMIC AND CLINICAL HEALTH (HITECH) ACT

This was created to promote effective technology implementation among care providers. It addresses privacy and security of electronic health records. The act also reinforces parts of the civil and criminal sections of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).HITECH outlines four liability levels, each with increased punishments. Offenders who violate the law unknowingly, initially receive the lowest fine and the opportunity to correct the offense in 30 days to avoid fines completely. The minimum penalty increases greatly between each level.The maximum fine amounts to $1.5 million. The health care fraud attorney handles this.

 

THE GENETIC INFORMATION NONDISCRIMINATION ACT OF 2008

Genome sequencing and other scientific developments have enabled researchers to produce incredible medical breakthroughs. While certain gene identifiers do not reveal ethnicity, some genetic traits emerge only among specific ethnic groups. Since discrimination occurred, the federal government created the Genetic Information Non-discrimination Act to prevent employers and insurance agencies from discriminating against individuals based on genetic testing outcomes. It forbids health insurance and employment discrimination based on genomic information.

 

CONCLUSION

Health care innovation moves at such a tremendous pace that even the most legally sound care providers have difficulty keeping up with legal issues. As care providers settle in with new payment models, they will demand more health care legal professionals to keep organizations up-to-date and compliant with the law. Check out this site: https://federal-lawyer.com/after-federally-indicted-options/

Comments Off on 5 HEALTH CARE LAWS PROTECTING THE RIGHTS OF PATIENTS

Take A Break from the Negative Effects of Health Care Fraud September 27, 2017

health-care-

Fighting health care fraud as a fulltime job can be a taxing.  Fighting to recoup money lost through waste, fraud and abuse has been the aim of the Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control (HCFAC) program since it began twenty years ago.  Through their capacity to fight using powerful tools and alliances, they have been successful in winning judgements, settlements, and impositions in many cases, and have returned more than $31 billion to the Medicare Trust Funds.  This would not be possible without cooperation between the government and the private sector.  If fighting health care fraud is your goal as a health care attorney, taking good care of yourself is just as important as catching the cheats working around the country to steal taxpayer’s money.

health-care-Pouring over evidence, interviewing witnesses, and flying around the country can be demanding work.  It’s rewarding when your team gets a judgement in your favor, but you must take care to spend some downtime and do it in a place that allows you to unwind and recharge so you can live to fight another day.  RIU Resorts offers the ideal setting for such breaks.  They have a group of all-inclusive packages that covers everything from your accommodations to meals.  Just imagine yourself on a sandy beach with the sun setting over the Pacific Ocean in RIU Mazatlán while you take in the view from the balcony of your suite.  This is not the end of a day chasing leads, it’s the end of a week of ecstasy.   And when you use a Groupon promo code celebrating RIU’s 20th anniversary, you’ll realize savings sure to help you clear your mind of all the arguments back and forth about culpability.  Getting away from the daily grind is good for your health.  You want to be strong enough to fight another day for others, so you’ve first got to be mentally and physically strong enough yourself.   Replace memories of a stress filled day in court with memories of long walks along sandy white beaches, cocktail hours, superb dining, and entertainment.

There’s been lots of research about the positive effects of negative ions on the human body.  Negative ions naturally occur when you’re near moving bodies of water, like the ocean.  There, the negative ions trap pollens and pollutants and cause them to drop out of the air you breathe.  Just like the oceans effect on the negative ions at the beach, RIU can have a positive effect on you.  They have enough freshwater pools, and sandy beaches to rid you of the negative effects in the air and the courtroom.

Comments Off on Take A Break from the Negative Effects of Health Care Fraud

Appeals Court Hears Another Challenge to Health Care Law November 7, 2016

Health Care Law

The Constitution of the United States grants certain powers to the federal government. Since President Obama’s Health Care Reform Act was passed, many health care lawyers have questioned whether or not the government has overstepped its bounds by passing this law. Another lawsuit has been filed in the aftermath of Obamacare, this one in the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals.

26 states filed the lawsuit in Florida, where a judge deemed the overhaul plan to be unconstitutional. The federal government has appealed the decision, and it is currently being heard by the US Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit. A group of small businesses and individuals are urging the court to uphold the decision which finds this law to be unconstitutional and unenforceable.

The Court consists of two democrats and one republican, all appointed to the Court. Their biggest concern is that this overhaul plan opens the door for the Federal Government to pass other sweeping mandates that would affect all Americans.

The health care plan hinges on several key factors. The one that is causing problems in court is the requirement that all people carry health coverage.

The individual mandate requires that all Americans have health insurance or face fines and penalties. The question asked of the government by Chief Judge Joel Dubina was, “If we uphold the individual mandate in this case, are there any limits on congressional power?” Judges Frank Hull and Stanley Marcus also expressed this same concern.

The country was founded with a strong belief that power should be split and balanced, to prevent any one group from exerting too much control. This single piece of legislation could theoretically undermine the balance of power that is central to how the country operates.

The response of the acting US Solicitor Neal Katyal is that health care is unique. Because it affects millions of people and health care lawyers, the government claims that the legislative branch has the power to regulate it because of the substantial effect on the economy. They claim that their actions will solve a national problem, making this a one-time event and not the start of a country down a slippery slope.checkout website from http://www.wsj.com/articles/obama-defends-health-care-law-1476999645 for more tips.

Former US solicitor Paul Clement argues that the government is essentially mandating people to make a commercial transaction, and that crosses the line between solving a problem and exceeding their authority.

Health Care LawJudge Hull doubted that this part of the Health Care Reform Act is truly necessary to the entire package. She expressed that other parts of the package could compensate for removing the individual health care mandate, including expanding Medicare discounts for seniors and the preexisting medical conditions aspects. Judges Hull and Dubina also questioned health care lawyers on both sides as to the effect on the Health Care Reform Act if just this one provision were invalidated in the courts.

Comparing quotes online for health insurance can save you a lot of money as you will be able to compare the rates offered by multiple insurance companies. It only takes a few minutes to see which insurance company offers the best price for you. There are so many sources of information which are also important to know because you never know you will need it in the future. Health care is very important, give some effort to find details about it or speak to a health care lawyer today.

Comments Off on Appeals Court Hears Another Challenge to Health Care Law

6 Ways Health Care Directives Fail

Health Care Directives

As mentioned by most health care lawyers, one of the most important pieces of a person’s estate plan is the Health Care Directive. Simply put, the Health Care Directive (or HCD for short), spells out how a person wants to be cared for when they become disabled. I say when they become disabled, because people are six times more likely to become disabled than die in a given year. We will all be disabled at one point; it could be the last 20 minutes of our life or the last 20 years.

Because of the risks of disability, it is wise to have your health care wishes legally stated. This is where the Health Care Directive comes into play. The HCD will state the treatments or procedures you would like once you become disabled. Additionally, the HCD will state the treatments or procedures you would not like. In fact, stating what you would not like may be just as important.

Since it is such an important document, the HCD should be reviewed every three to five years. Just like a Will or a Trust, the HCD may need to be updated. Here is a list of six ways that Health Care Directives fail:

1. Not in Doctor’s Hands (Accessibility) –When the time comes for you to use your Health Care Directive, you may not be conscious. If that’s the case, you will want your HCD to be in your doctor’s hands when you arrive at the hospital. In fact, this is a simple step that many people do not take, which can lead to your wishes being dismissed when a new HCD is created (see #6).

2. No HIPAA Authorization – An incredibly important document that should accompany your Health Care Directive is a HIPAA Authorization. HIPAA stands for the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. This document authorizes other Loved Ones to receive updates on your treatment status. If you are an elderly parent, you may want your adult children to know about your health.

3. Not Properly Written – A Health Care Directive that is poorly written will not get better with age! Different people want different options when it comes to deciding their healthcare choices. Usually a “template” HCD cannot offer these choices.

4. Wrong Parties – The people whom you designate on your HCD should actually be the people you want to make decisions on your behalf. Surprisingly, I have seen many HCDs that spell out the wrong people (or parties).

5. Old / Out of date – What happens when the person you designated as your Agent seventeen years ago has already passed away? Or what happens when your Agent has moved to California and won’t be able to travel to Minnesota? An out of date HCD is a ticking time bomb.

Health Care Directives6. Revoked By Accident – Yes, this happens. In fact, it can happen quite easily. Here’s how: if the doctor at the emergency room asks your spouse or child about a HCD and they are unsure, they may sign a new “template” HCD right in the emergency room lobby. Chances are, this “template” HCD may not be the same as the well thought out version you completed with your attorney while you were peaceful and sound of mind.view more updated blog post http://www.valleymorningstar.com/life/health_wellness/article_6d18d11e-a160-11e6-bcac-eba4746f4cac.html

A Health Care Directive is an essential part of most people’s estate plans. However, it must be reviewed regularly to ensure that it continues to protect you as you wish. It’s a good idea to talk with an experienced health care lawyer to see what is best for you.

Comments Off on 6 Ways Health Care Directives Fail

10 Things Pre-Boomers Need From Health Care Reform

Health Care

With several bills coming out of both houses of congress, the health care discussion by health care lawyers appears to be far from over even though the administration wants legislation signed this year. The politics of reform are intensifying each passing day. Therefore, without regard to party affiliation, I’ve tried to identify key points for pre-boomers to consider when it comes to health care reform.

The following 10 points are in no particular order.

And, I purposely do not take into consideration what other age or demographic groups may want or need. As a pre-boomer, I believe the items listed below are, or should be, the deal breakers in any health care bill offered to my generation (those born between 1930 and 1945).

1. Ability to keep current doctor(s) and be able to visit them as needed.

2. Assurance of complete and consistent health care until death.

3. Portability of insurance, because seniors do move.

4. Coverage will not be given other groups at the expense of seniors.

5. Allow competition among insurance companies so premium costs can be lower.

6. Insurance companies cannot cancel secondary coverage no matter what.

7. No extra premiums or denials for pre-existing conditions.

8. Any reform must be deficit neutral to keep taxes from going up.

9. Test proposed plan elements rather than initiate immediate, sweeping changes.

10. Eliminate Medicare and Medicaid waste, fraud and abuse, as promised.

Reducing Medicare and Medicaid funding by over $600 billion in order to provide insurance for those currently not covered is not going to fly with most new seniors, certainly not this one. Don’t you wonder how many people are truly uninsured because they can’t afford the premiums or have pre-existing conditions versus those who, for whatever reason, choose not to buy insurance or are here illegally?

The notion that more than a half a trillion dollars in saving can be achieved by reducing waste, health care fraud and abuse is highly questionable. And if it were true, why didn’t the government take steps to realize these savings before the current debate heated up? So someone needs to identify the problems and fix them now.

There have been many implied promises but no guarantees that seniors will not be placed on some kind of rationing or other changes which result in reducing the quality of our health care and health care fraud in the years ahead. So we must be skeptical until the details are revealed.visit site from http://www.wsj.com/articles/worst-performing-stocks-of-2016-health-care-1478433602 for more info.

Health CareIn the meantime, keep the pressure on our representatives in Washington. Ask how they intend to deal with the above 10 points, plus any others you can think of. If we are respectfully persistent with questions, maybe the politicians will get the idea that pre-boomers are serious about our health care coverage. However, should they not be responsive to our needs, and then we don’t need them anymore. And we’ll vote for someone who is willing to listen to the generation of new seniors.

Don Potter, a Philadelphia native, was born in 1936 and is a 50 year veteran of the advertising agency business. Now living in Los Angeles, he has written two novels in retirement, frequently writes on marketing issues, and has a blog dedicated to pre-boomers (those born between 1930 and 1945).

Read more articles for and about pre-boomers with thoughts, comments and opinions designed to spark thinking, foster discussion, and stimulate debate by logging on to this link.

Comments Off on 10 Things Pre-Boomers Need From Health Care Reform